Schwab Foundation Case Study · 2025

Corporate Social Innovators Selection for Schwab Social Innovation Awards

For a Schwab Foundation / WEF case, I designed a process to find, assess and verify the 2026 Corporate Social Innovator awardees.

Role: Strategy & process design Format: 5-slide case presentation Audience: WEF leadership panel Time: 10-minute presentation
01 · Challenge

The Challenge

The challenge was separating real systemic change from strong corporate messaging.

1

Candidate Discovery

Strong candidates may be hidden inside large companies and may never apply.

2

Assessment

Leadership, culture and impact can be judged differently by each juror.

3

Verification

Most claims are self-reported. They needed to be checked before selection.

Approach

I reframed the task as a sourcing, scoring and verification system.

02 · Solution

Solution Overview

The process linked sourcing, assessment and verification.

03 · Original work

Inside the presentation

Three slides from the original case presentation show how the proposed process moved from sourcing to structured assessment and selection.

Slide 02 · Sourcing

Building a broad candidate pipeline

The sourcing logic expands discovery beyond candidates already visible within established networks.

Slide 03 · Assessment

Making qualitative evidence comparable

The assessment stage translates broad award criteria into a consistent basis for comparison.

Slide 04 · Selection

Moving evidence toward a decision

The final stages combine verification and structured discussion before the award decision.

04 · Frameworks

Frameworks

Each framework solved one risk in the process.

01

Multi-channel Sourcing

Purpose: find candidates who may never self-apply.

02

Assessment Framework

Purpose: turn soft criteria into comparable evidence.

03

Verification

Purpose: verify claims before the final decision.

05 · Problem → Decision

Problem → Decision

The work turned an open brief into a clear operating model.

Candidate Discovery

Problem
Corporate innovators may never apply directly.


Decision
Developed a multi-channel sourcing strategy using nominations, partner networks and proactive outreach.

Assessment

Problem
Leadership, culture and systemic impact are difficult to evaluate consistently.


Decision
Built an assessment framework with measurable indicators across six evaluation dimensions.

Verification

Problem
Corporate impact claims are largely self-reported.


Decision
Introduced independent due diligence before the final selection process.

Final Selection

Problem
Final decisions require both evidence and expert judgement.


Decision
Combined structured evaluation with panel discussion to support consistent decision-making.