Candidate Discovery
Strong candidates may be hidden inside large companies and may never apply.
For a Schwab Foundation / WEF case, I designed a process to find, assess and verify the 2026 Corporate Social Innovator awardees.
The challenge was separating real systemic change from strong corporate messaging.
Strong candidates may be hidden inside large companies and may never apply.
Leadership, culture and impact can be judged differently by each juror.
Most claims are self-reported. They needed to be checked before selection.
I reframed the task as a sourcing, scoring and verification system.
The process linked sourcing, assessment and verification.
Three slides from the original case presentation show how the proposed process moved from sourcing to structured assessment and selection.
The sourcing logic expands discovery beyond candidates already visible within established networks.
The assessment stage translates broad award criteria into a consistent basis for comparison.
The final stages combine verification and structured discussion before the award decision.
Each framework solved one risk in the process.
Purpose: find candidates who may never self-apply.
Purpose: turn soft criteria into comparable evidence.
Purpose: verify claims before the final decision.
The work turned an open brief into a clear operating model.
Problem
Corporate innovators may never apply directly.
Decision
Developed a multi-channel sourcing strategy using nominations, partner networks and proactive outreach.
Problem
Leadership, culture and systemic impact are difficult to evaluate consistently.
Decision
Built an assessment framework with measurable indicators across six evaluation dimensions.
Problem
Corporate impact claims are largely self-reported.
Decision
Introduced independent due diligence before the final selection process.
Problem
Final decisions require both evidence and expert judgement.
Decision
Combined structured evaluation with panel discussion to support consistent decision-making.